The Difference Between Saint Peter and a Caesar of Rome

The Difference Between Saint Peter and a Caesar of Rome █

The Bible affirms that Jesus never sinned (Hebrews 4:15).
However, it also says that he was betrayed to fulfill a prophecy in Psalm 41:4-10, where the betrayed confesses to having sinned.
How can this be applied to someone who had no sin?
Why force that connection in John 13:18?
Why were the Caesars silent?
Because under their direction, in a series of councils—Nicaea, Rome, Hippo, Carthage—they decided what humanity should believe.
Under their shadow, they disguised lies as truth and enshrined their fraud as “faith.”
The image gives it away: a winged, long-haired man, dressed as a Roman soldier and brandishing a sword, crushing an unarmed man.

The persecutor is glorified, and the just is presented as if he were the devil.
And to cover up the crime, the imperial soldier was given a heavenly name: “Michael.”
And to seal the farce, the Roman oppressor was baptized with an angelic name: “Michael.”
Thus, the Roman persecutor was sanctified, and the sword that oppresses was presented as the sword that saves.
Thus, they canonized violence and sanctified the sword that crushes, not to defend justice, but to cover up tyranny.

But the truth, even if they try to bury it under their councils and idols, lives on.

But the truth does not die: it burns in every heart that rejects deception and rises up against the empire of shadows.

Luke 11:21 When a strong man armed guards his palace, his possessions are safe. 22 But when a stronger than he comes and overcomes him, he takes away all his armor in which he trusted and divides the spoils.